|
|
| (246 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown) |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| {|style="background: #F5FFFA;border:solid 1px #A3BFB1;border-top:none;padding:10px;width:100%" | | {|style="background: #F5FFFA;border:solid 1px #A3BFB1;border-top:none;padding:10px;width:100%" |
| |- | | |- |
| |When starting a new discussion on this page, please add it <span class="stealthexternallink"> [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:General_Discussion&action=edit§ion=new at the bottom] </span> with a relevant title. Please sign all comments using four tides (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>), or the [[Image:Button sig.png|sign]] button. | | |When starting a new discussion on this page, please add it <span class="stealthexternallink"> [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:General_Discussion&action=edit§ion=new at the bottom] </span> with a relevant title. Please sign all comments using four tides (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>), or the [[Image:Sign.png|sign]] button. |
| This page is for shorter discussions - please don't add irrelevant discussions (see the column to your left) or spam to this page. | | This page is for shorter discussions - please don't add irrelevant discussions (see the column to your left) or spam to this page. |
| Older discussions with no replies in the past month will periodically be moved into [[UDWiki:General Discussion/Archive|archives]]. | | Older discussions with no replies in the past month will periodically be moved into [[UDWiki:General Discussion/Archive|archives]]. |
| Line 20: |
Line 20: |
|
| |
|
| {{TOCright}} | | {{TOCright}} |
|
| |
| == The Great Suburb Group Massacre 2010? ==
| |
|
| |
| What do you say? It's been almost a year since the last one, and although we still have a few weeks left in 2009, I don't see why we can't get it done by the end of the year. Think of it as a wiki-wide resolution. Is anyone in favor of another activity check starting within the next week or so?--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :I don't think it so necessary just now, but I'd help out. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 05:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::I had talked briefly with Rooster about this and felt that maybe the 2nd week of January would be better since people are likely not to be checking the wiki regularly (if at all) right now due to the holidays and finals and all that jazz. But yes, it is overdue--as is a Radio Frequency Massacre. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 06:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Yeah, I'm more up for the timing that Maverick and Iscariot mentioned. It's best to wait until after the New Year before starting. But I'm definitely in favor of another one, and we could probably roll the Radio Frequency Massacre into the same operation...if the group doesn't acknowledge, we can just zap any frequencies they have as well. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Suburb_Group_Listings&curid=129676&diff=1624697&oldid=1624694 It's all in hand]. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 08:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| And in fairness should only take 3 weeks. [[Pitneybank]] first time around had 43 groups, now its got 8. Which reminds me, I need to go ask the [[MPD]] if their suburb listings are accurate. Last DEM group to do. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Exactly. These aren't so necessary anymore, it was the initial one that did the job. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::I want a new sexy template though. The inactive ones Link did for top of pages is fine, but we want something 2010ish for the actual activity check. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::Okays --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::So maybe start first week of January?--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 00:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::Second! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::If DDR's dead-set on starting on the second week, I have no issue with that either. :P {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::::I think he means seconded. I could be wrong.--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 02:07, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::::I'm guessing he meant "seconded" as well, but I was making an attempt at a tongue-in-cheek comment. It seems I'm too tired at the moment to do so very well. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 02:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::::::It's okay Aichon; we're all tired.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::::::Sorry guys :( I meant the second week. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Wiki bug? ==
| |
|
| |
| Anyone else see two misplaced [edit] symbols under the "Become a fan" section of [[Malton Medical Staff]]?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 04:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Nope, just you. -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 04:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :The section isn't labeled that, but I see them as well. I'm guessing it might be related to their use of images somehow, but am now sure. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 05:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::Yeah, it's a common problem with images aligned to the right, so I'm not sure why it's happening with ''some'' people when all the images are on the left, it may be the group template, I can't tell cause I can't see it an I can't find a Become a Fan section. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 06:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::It's actually [[Malton_Medical_Staff#Join_the_Staff.2C_or_be_a_Fan|this section]]. And there's at least one image aligned on the right there. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Yeah, it's a buildup from the section two above that one, because of that long image alongside it, I presume. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:19, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::Solution ideas, anyone?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 15:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::A few ideas:
| |
| ::::::#Use smaller images (i.e. images that are vertically smaller than the sections they are in).
| |
| ::::::#Use a table/div layout, and place the images in a completely separate column/div. Note that a div within the text will still have the problem.
| |
| ::::::#Use the <nowiki>__NOEDITSECTION__</nowiki> [[Help:Magic_Words#Behaviour_switches|magic word]] if you don't actually need those edit links.
| |
| ::::::#Create your own edit links and place them where you want. It's possible, but tricky, and I don't have the code laying around for it at the moment.
| |
| ::::::Those are my best bets, but they all require changing the page visually somehow. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::::::Thanks Aichon; I'll just kill the edit links.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 21:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::: Meh.... --[[Image:Weed.jpg|14px]][[User:Imthatguy|<span style= "color: green; background-color: white">'''''Imthatguy''''']][[Image:Weed.jpg|14px]]''' found some weed '''</span> 20:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Fixing the mess that is the Guides namespace ==
| |
|
| |
| For the sake of organization, we should make Guides: a proper namespace (via Kevan,) instead of the pseudo-namespace it is now. [[User:Linkthewindow/guidesnamespace|A few pages will have to be moved]] (possibly more.)
| |
|
| |
| Thoughts on this? {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 04:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Why the hell not. Having proper namespaces created from pseudos doesn't hurt anyone, and guides have been a part of the wiki since the beginning. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| ::It makes sense to have it be a proper namespace, but I'm unaware of what it would change at a practical day-to-day basis level. How would this help organization? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :::You'll be able to use <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> properly, and use search to find all guides more easily. Also, my general impression has always been that pseudo-namespaces are Not Good. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 06:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| If it were me, I would just assume that [[wikipedia:WP:SILENCE|silence implies consent]] and ask Kevan to add the new mainspace.
| |
|
| |
| But, I feel like doing a straw poll, to confirm that I've got consensus for what's a really quite a minor change. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 14:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :You've got my consent. So that's three... did you need more? :P --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 19:50, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::If this is the straw poll, then you have mine as well. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Dead. ==
| |
|
| |
| Like I said almost ayear ago.<br>
| |
| Urban Dead is slowly dieing.........
| |
| Well I'mmouta here--[[User:Jerrel Yokotory|Jerrel Yokotory]] 01:44, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Yes. And...? Some of us only discovered the game within the last year. It's still enjoyable. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::HOLY SHIT IT'S DYING JUMP SHIP {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::<nowiki>*</nowiki>awaits Jerrel's return to say the exact same thing in a few months* --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 02:06, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Still like it, still play it, still think you're a drama queen attention-whore who is full of crap.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Still bitter you didn't get ops?!? No power trippin for you! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Ou sont les neiges d'antan? ==
| |
|
| |
| I don't know if anyone else is seeing this, but it looks like the snow has stopped. Can anyone confirm this, and if so, is it worth putting on the in-game news template?--{{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 20:51, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Confirmed, but not worth reporting.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::Where '''''are''''' the snows of yesteryear? They made the world so white...{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 23:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Just stuck it as an unofficial note in News. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Was this [[Talk:News]] not good enough for you? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::Not really, I just checked around the archives and did it the way I'd also seen it done. ''You're'' the weirdo in THIS outfit. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:25, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::Sorry. Wasn't really concentrating. Got to do a lot of preperation for my upcoming arbies case. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 13:44, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::It's cool, I was just kidding. I wouldn't have added it on there but I missed your entry on the talk page, I assumed any action would have been noted here so I just stuck it on the main. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == District pages? ==
| |
|
| |
| After some initial coding, I have decided to follow [[User:The Rooster|Rooster's]] advice and just check with the general community before I do anything further. As some of the folks here know, I'm a big believer in [[districts]] as a concept and as a means of organizing Malton into manageable bits. As such, I have been working on district versions of the standard [[District SW-2|suburb page]] and the [[District SW-2 Barricade Plan|barricade plan pages]].
| |
|
| |
| Obviously both of these example pages need some work, but I am checking here to see if people think these would be worthwhile additions to the wiki or not. If they are, then I will get to work on sprucing up these example pages into a nice clean format before creating ones for all the other districts. If the community doesn't think that they are needed, then I will take them to Deletions. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 10:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :I guess it's up to you, but I really don't think they are so necessary. [[Suburb]] is a fine enough system on its own. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 10:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Personally, I agree with DDR. I don't think they're ''needed'', as the current system is already enough, and this would probably give more work, rather than lubricating the system. But, like DDR said, if you feel that these would be helpful, you might as well make them.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 13:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::I'd say setup the rose district and see if it takes off as a usual page. No point doing them all yet. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 18:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::I think they're worthwhile but not ''necessary'', in the strictest sense. That said, I think the organic approach Ross suggests is a good one. Let's see the Rose District act as a template for the others. I think it can be made to work, and can be useful, but I think they'll be much less dynamic than the suburb pages in the end. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 19:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| I'm not quite sure if this is the correct place to ask this, but if it is, then please disregard this statement.
| |
|
| |
| I've been using Wiki.UrbanDead for a while now and I just have a small question regarding the pages of individual buildings in the districts of Malton. I was just curious if it is allowed to alter building descriptions and post pictures of buildings from real life so that the building would have a bit more history and flavor to it rather than just an empty page. --[[User:Adlehyde|Adlehyde]] 19:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :Yes. But remember this is a collaborative process, so don't be a dick if someone disagrees with your additions. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 21:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::I am aware that this is a collaborative process and in most cases, I am quite passive when it comes to disagreements so it shouldn't pose a problem. As well, I am curious if it is frowned upon to improve the grammar, punctuation, sentence structure of entries made by other people? The reason I ask this, is because I was looking around districts and having found one and a building that suits my needs, I find that is has a lot of entry history, some of which dates back to 2007. --[[User:Adlehyde|Adlehyde]] 22:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::Define 'entries'. If it's unsigned history fluff, go change it. If it's a signed comment like this, don't. If you're talking about old news postings, they can be archived. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 22:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::By entries, I mean that it is old but signed history and news fluff. I can post the link to the page if you'd like to see what building I am referring to. I also discovered that there are two links on the bottom of the page, both linking to archival pages for tenant entries and listings of tenants. If permitted, I could clean up the page so it isn't a long listing of entries and history. --[[User:Adlehyde|Adlehyde]] 22:34, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Just out of curiosity, is there a way to rediscover the district in which your character "woke up"? I can't remember where my guy started from. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 13:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :No, there's not. I remember my namesake alt starting in Quarlesbank, but everyone else escapes me. Shame, really. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 14:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::Damn. I was hoping that there was a way, just one way I could find out. I mean, I don't mind making it up, but I'm gonna hate myself for doing it. And it's even more annoying considering this is the first character I've really played. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 14:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::How long have you had the character? If you haven't moved much and you know how long you've had it, you can narrow it down quite a bit. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 14:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::I've had the character since mid-January and I've moved around a lot. I was relatively new to the game and wanted to see what Urban Dead was like. Such a bad mistake, IMHO. *Sigh* It's interesting though. I mean, even from what I can that it's entirely randomized, it'd be cool if there was a way for your starting location to be logged. Amazingly enough, while I was looking at all notepad documents on my computer, I found a saved document saying that my guy was from Barter Road Fire Station in West Grayside. I can't believe I saved it to a document, but now that I think about it, I remember it vaguely. Amazing what you can find in your saved document files, isn't it?--[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 15:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==Destroying the Red Links==
| |
|
| |
| The wiki is currently full of [[Red Links]], basically pages that don't exist, but are listed on other pages. These are generally due to them
| |
|
| |
| *Never being created by people who start something and then don't finish it.
| |
| *People who mispell page names, normally Location pages.
| |
| *Pages that were deleted or moved in the past.
| |
|
| |
| The current number is 16000.
| |
|
| |
| Most of these links (8000 or so) are only linked in one place, namely an admin archive, which records when they were moved, deleted.
| |
|
| |
| As such I propose revisiting these protected archives and removing the brackets from their entries.
| |
|
| |
| So for example [[Red Links]] becomes Red Links.
| |
|
| |
| The page histories themselves will remain, and you can still find them recorded on the appropriate page, along with the reasons for their initial removal. And they can still be found by searching, they just won't be listed on [[Special:Wantedpages]]
| |
|
| |
| Any objections? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 16:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :I have a major objection, it screws with our [[Philosophe_Knights/Kill_List|Kill List]] which is designed to show up when someone creates an account with the same name as the victim.
| |
|
| |
| :Also, isn't this going to wreck the 'What Links Here' functionality? That's going to make getting recreated pages deleted hell because it'll be a nightmare to find the previous case. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 16:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::PK list has a specific objection, that's fair. We'll make the PK list page immune, as you've got a valid reason for it to exist. As for recreation hell, how about a year limit? All the lists from 2005-2008 are dilinkified, and it rolls forward per year. Do we have an issue with pages being recreated over a year later? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::Won't searching for the page title still bring the previous case back up? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 17:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)#
| |
| ::::How about we leave it all alone and you lot go put all the links back. Red links affect '''no-one''' excepting those with OCD who are looking at obscure lists generated by wiki software. There's no reason to make life harder for people in any way for this. Go do something useful with your time instead. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 17:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::::Regardless of how this discussion goes, Im going to trawl the links. Several hundred of these Red Links are ridiculously lazy locations mispellings. The suggestion here is just because I'm lazy. Its all part of a process. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::It doesn't fucking help when Mis is purging them from protected pages, so even though there's disagreement no-one can do anything except cause drama through an arbitration case to force reversions until the end of the case. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 17:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::::::If more than one person decides they want red links to misspelt Danger Report pages back, I can revert all my edits. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 17:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::::[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Speedy_Deletions/Archive/May-2008&diff=prev&oldid=1674836 I see] more than danger reports. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 17:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::::::::Yep. Hold up for now. We'll got consensus either way. No point doing lots if we're going to have to revert. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::::::Seems like correcting misspellings is fine, but I'm a bit up in the air on eliminating formerly-legitimate links to pages that have since been deleted. Seems like it could lead to "sleeper" problems that won't be obvious or apparent until later. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::Your list shouldn't be affected by this; I'm pretty sure there aren't user pages on Special:Wanted.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::That's nice to know, but the group's wiki page is not in User space. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::::The pages they're linking to are, and that's what matters. :P --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 10:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :::::<nowiki>*</nowiki>slaps forehead* Point. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Iscariot is right, but that shouldn't stop you from going through the right links Ross and either nuking them or just removing their brackets, for the ones that ''should'' be dealt with as such. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 08:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :'''Sigh'''. Looks Like I'm going to have to do it "properly". --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| Given the amount of time without support, can we have all of these that were done undone now? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:41, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :I didn't actually realise he'd gone through with doing those sorts of links? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:47, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Some of the [[Biblical Times|older]] deletion archives were altered. I don't mind [[Monumental Fuck Ups|typos]] being fixed but to remove [[EVERYONE!|all]] links can lead to making comments [[J3D's Latest Wiki Group|nonsensical]] especiall when [[Me, me, and especially me|some]] of us use links in regular sentences by altering the link text. Point made? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 14:16, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::I rolled back any of my changes. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:01, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::What I don't understand is why none of those high-linked admin archives were changed. I actually inadvertently put them on my projects list this arvo, but meh. The point is I never actually monitored the work Ross had done on these so I didn't know he'd actually 'fixed' those links we complained about, let alone kept them. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 15:15, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| The links to deleted pages should not be broken. Going to the whatlinkshere page of deleted pages is a good way to find out the history and context of a page that has been deleted. It saves manually going looking for the relevant archives <small>-- <span style="text-shadow: #bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">[[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup></span> 11:56 11 April 2010 (BST)</small>
| |
| :That was the consensus. As such I'm trawling through the links for stuff that is obviously spelling mistakes, mostly on locations. Anything that had an editing history is being left as it is. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 14:45, 11 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Just out of curiosity,... ==
| |
|
| |
| When you go to the [[Urban Dead]] website, and you see the side bar google ads, like the one for <span class="stealthexternallink">[http://www.erepublik.com/en/referrer/Zaebos eRepublik]</span>, I assume that Kevin gets some sort of kick back for those to help support the game. Does anyone know how much? -{{User:Poodle_of_doom/signiture}} 18:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :What's the deal with the referrer in your link?--[[User:ConfusedMatthew|ConfusedMatthew]] 13:08, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
| :I think it may have actually been mentioned somewhere on his talk page, but I'm not sure tbh. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:14, 31 March 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Vandalism? ==
| |
|
| |
| I could be wrong, but I think there's been some high-scale vandalism on the Malton suburb map. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 05:35, 1 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Oh yeah, it might be April first where some of you live...nevermind. {{unsigned|TheBardofAwesome}}
| |
| ::Yep, it was a prank for April Fool's done by a random user. I've reverted the edits. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:21, 1 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| == Suburb Maps on redrum.soul-fantasy.net==
| |
|
| |
| On each suburb's page, there is a link to it's map on redrum.soul-fantasy.net. For example, Dakerstown is http://redrum.soul-fantasy.net/map.php?suburb=1. These maps were very high quality and superior to the other maps available on the wiki.
| |
|
| |
| This website has been down for the last few months. Does anyone know why?
| |
| --[[User:BravoLeader|BravoLeader]] 06:55, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :I think a major historical UD portal went down a month or two ago... I think it was Resens or something, this may be where the maps were hosted. I'm very sure there were mirror sites somewhere... --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:18, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::There are two alternatives that offer similar features as the old RedRum one:
| |
| ::*http://map.aypok.co.uk/index.php
| |
| ::*http://dssrzs.org/map
| |
| ::Hope those help if that has been a request for alternatives. --[[User:Spiderzed|Spiderzed]] 07:39, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Oh man, thanks for that, nice work! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:59, 6 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::Speaking on either of those maps, spiderzed, do you know if there is an option to turn the free running lanes on and off? this was a great aspect of the redrum map and I can't seem to find it on either of these maps? ty in advance. --[[User:Bonghit420|Dirty]] 00:17, 19 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::Neither of those maps has the feature, though I don't know why, since it's easy to set up. One of the scripts I wrote even has free running lanes indicated, though you can't toggle it. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:02, 19 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ===furthermore...===
| |
| Should we be replacing the redrum links (on individual suburb pages) above with the new ones? the redrum maps have been down for a while haven't they? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:33, 18 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :We should. The old links won't work any more since they don't use that domain name any longer. Personally, I'd prefer the DSS maps, I think, though I suppose we could consider ways to introduce both links in order to not play favorites. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 11:39, 18 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::You lot are the code monkeys, can't we find a way to replicate the same system in the wiki so we don't have to rely on a third party and potentially partisan website? I thought we'd learnt this lesson with the iWitness link on the main page. -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 12:21, 18 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::If I had the time, I could make one, sure, but it'd still have to be hosted on my own site, rather than here, since there's just no way to replicate some of those features in wikicode. In the end, that'd be as partisan as anything else, since I'd be driving traffic to my own site for personal gain. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:12, 19 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Just following up, after getting a reminder on my talk page, I did go ahead and modify [[Template:Suburb]] to point to DSS instead. It was a relatively painless fix, though I had to apply a urlencoder in order to have it handle the suburbs with two words in the name. I couldn't see a feasible way to work in both maps, nor do I see how we could produce our own on the wiki, so, for now, I'm just maintaining the status quo. Let me know if you spot any problems, or feel free to tweak it yourself since that template isn't protected. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 09:00, 27 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Looks good. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 11:15, 27 April 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Party's goin' down. ==
| |
|
| |
| Anyone here interested in dropping by?
| |
|
| |
| I didn't know if this was the best place to post a wiki-wide discussion of UD, but I couldn't find anywhere better.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:32, 24 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Huh? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 00:42, 24 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::<nowiki>:(</nowiki> Can't. MTG nationals qualifiers. If I go 0-3 first day I'll maybe find time to swing by. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:44, 24 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Oh. Sorry. Hosting this at the same time as Escape was a silly idea :( --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:01, 24 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Ffffffffffffft. Those guys? I didn't even know they had something planned on the same day, but you could see this as an anti-ESCAPE movement. ESCAPE is all about leaving Malton because people want an end; the MMS bash is all about enjoying Malton and partying it up with our fellow UDers.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 22:22, 24 May 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| This is a bad day for everyone. MCM Expo, Mis' MTG tournie, Escape, etc. Make it the weekend after and I'm all yours... :( --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:56, 24 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :If I could... but I can't. Too much planning has already gone into it.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:18, 25 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Ah well. You'll just have to make do without us then. --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:00, 25 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Shame about that.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 21:20, 25 May 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| [http://iamscott.net/1275091522274.html party][http://iamscott.net/1275114219765.html was][http://iamscott.net/1275189790267.html off][http://iamscott.net/1275367750479.html the hook.]{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:46, 1 June 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Could use some wiki-help... ==
| |
|
| |
| [[User:Mazzola|Mazzola]] is trying to add some content to the previously barren [[Membry Lane Fire Station]] page. An admirable desire I'm sure we'll all agree, and it arises out of an attachment he feels to the place his character started out. Unfortunately, he isn't well versed in the nuances of NPOV/POV wikilawyering, and honestly, I'm not entirely sure where the lines are myself. Could a user who knows this system better, possibly even a sysop (though anyone would be appreciated), consider helping him flush out this page in a wiki-friendly manner? I think he just needs some clear DOs and DONTs or something of that ilk.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 18:29, 26 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Bump. Still need some help with this page.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 22:52, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Had a browse, fixed it as I saw fit. The only thing I thought was slightly off was the nude paintings bit, so I removed that. Anyone in the world feel free to revert my edits.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:56, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Well he's going to keep editing and updating it; what he really needs is someone who can tell him what is and isn't acceptable POV. I certainly can't do it: I have no idea.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:01, 28 May 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Some odd questions ==
| |
|
| |
| I've had a couple questions regarding things that may or may not have already been covered. If the questions have already been covered, please feel free to delete this topic after directing me to the answers.
| |
|
| |
| 1. I understand that the city of Malton is divided up into suburbs, but where would the actual suburban houses be? Would they be found on the streets like Wilton Drive and if so, wouldn't the streets have a higher percentage of finding items as most suburban houses have some amount of usable items?
| |
|
| |
| 2. I haven't checked all the wastelands yet, but would construction sites be seen as wastelands RP-wise?
| |
|
| |
| I'll add more questions as I come across them.
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 01:51, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :All the houses were eaten by a grue, and since this is in England, they don't have construction sites: only warlock gathering lots and places that still haven't been fixed since the last air raid.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:00, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Grue must have quite a large appetite, especially for fictional predators who revel in the dark. In addition, I thought the country of Malton was uncertain?--[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 02:05, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Most people agree that Malton is in Kevin's home country (plus, it has pubs), and inspired by an actual city of the same name in England. You can consider the part of Malton survivors are trapped in to be the downtown portion: devoid of housing except in hotels and the office-like apartments. The wastelands can be whatever you want them to be for RP purposes, but are likely undeveloped lots or (as you say) construction sites.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:17, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::Alright, thank you Lelouch vi Britannia. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 02:28, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::No problem. Feel free to raise any other questions you might come up with; I'll be here all eternity. Party on Friday!{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:30, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::Malton's actually having a by-election right now.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:37, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Simply put see [[Vinetown]] all the streets are assumed to be housing areas, and some wastelands are construction sites. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:54, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Speaking of which, Ross, I dunno if you've seen the Unemplementia posted area page, but I posted my two areas West and East Jackson. Their details follow the map. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 18:31, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Thirsk and Malton By-election ==
| |
|
| |
| Coming to a UDwiki near YOU! No seriously, another election-style thing, similar to [[Mayor of Malton]], but for an MP seat (links to what's happening at this second, and prevents Morbulskond from losing his seat.) This is my suggestion for you all. Mull it over and give opinions. If there's positive feedback, I'll set something up on Monday after my weekend away.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:41, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| : Will you be running? --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 22:42, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Mebee. Maybe not. We'll see how I'm feeling at the time.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 22:43, 27 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :No, just do another Mayor thing. You think maybe its about time the 2 year inactive was replaced? MP seats are too political and gay. WE NEED ONE ALMIGHTY AUTOCRAT! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:09, 28 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::I only like the MP thing because of the context in the real world. Whatever's good, this must be done.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:34, 28 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::I dunno, since the power is hollow and it's just for RP value, i've never seen a reason for it. But I guess it'll be fun. Just don't tell Sonny. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:37, 28 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::Right, we have to pull this off in less than a month! Quickly, to the gyrocopter!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 07:43, 28 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::Haha!!! Love it! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 07:46, 28 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::I don't mind being an election monitor. I will be almost entirely impartial. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 09:57, 28 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::I hereby declare myself running. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:04, 28 May 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Anyone want to make [[Mayor of Malton/2010| a page]] for it?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:03, 31 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :People run as candidates and junk!--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 18:10, 1 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Put this up on the Community Portal events IMO. I think this is a good demonstration of how this stuff ''should'' be pushed the community as fun, harmless RP material. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 04:40, 2 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::I would but for some reason I can't find it. Link please?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 09:56, 2 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::It's on the maaaaiiiiin ppaaaaaggeeee..... --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 11:04, 2 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::{Facepalm} I've linked it now.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 11:17, 2 June 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Insta-categorising ==
| |
|
| |
| Considering adding [[:Category:Groups]] in a <nowiki><includeonly></nowiki> tag in [[Template:Groupbox]] so all groups that use it are automatically categorised for our convenience. thoughts? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:52, 29 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Make it another field. Have it so that completing a field with either "Survivor", "PKer" or "Zombie" will create complete the line of code <nowiki>[[Category:{{1}} Groups]]</nowiki>. Or do your way. Either way means less work. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 14:55, 29 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::While I really like Mis' idea and wish it could be made to work, people will abuse it or misunderstand it and we'll end up with hundreds of variant spellings and oddball categories with just one entry in them each (take a look at [[Recruitment]] to see what groups identify themselves as, for instance). DDR's idea is simple and should work, however, and I think it'd be a good idea. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 21:32, 29 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Better yet, do both! Using {{tl|Switch}}, {{tl|Groupbox}} could be quite easily made to default to [[:Category:Groups]] if an incorrect subcat is specifified. {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 21:58, 31 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::I suppose that is true...hmm...*gears start turning* {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:32, 31 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::^What he said. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 22:27, 29 May 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::I considered doing a similar idea to Mis but its not newbie fail proof enough, as Aichon said. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 22:56, 29 May 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Updates? ==
| |
|
| |
| I was enjoying Urban Dead, but now the game has no new updates. Not offending Kevin in anyway of course! Its just at the moment its half way through summer,and we are still in Malton as winter! Are there new updates soon? {{User:Shiznoe/sig}}18:35, 30 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| :I've heard plans for updates over the summer but I'm not sure how big or what they are. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 18:42, 30 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| :If anything else, you can suggest some new types of updates on the suggestions page. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 18:49, 30 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Well, Kev cited a major update as the reason for no April fools update, and its UD's 5th anniversary in a week. Plus Kev's updating his twitter feed, so hes not dead. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 19:32, 30 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Go to Kevan.org and play catfishing instead, it's better ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 02:32, 1 July 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == The Guides page and namespace, and reorganisation ==
| |
|
| |
| Before I went on hiatus, I complied [[User:Linkthewindow/guidesnamespace|this]] list of guides that were in the mainspace, and a suggested move-to location. This is to keep consistency throughout the Guides name space. I'm thinking about (finally) getting around to putting that list through [[A/MR]] when I give it a quick update, but I figured it would be prudent to ask if anyone has any complaints first. So, complain here.
| |
|
| |
| Also, it's probably well overdue that we remove the text at the top of the guides page with something more modern. At the moment, the [[Guides|text]] is from 2005 and is largely irrelevant. It's probably worth replacing it with a block of text introducing the page and stating that edit rules are generally different for guides. Again, sound off if you've got any problems. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 15:54, 15 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :My only problem is that I don't think I have enough excuses to not fill the move requests. Stick them up and I'll work through them after work tonight, I see no reason why they shouldn't be moved. As for updating the preamble to the Guides page, I'll see what I can manage. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 15:56, 15 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::I'll have another look for guides that aren't in the correct namespace, and then stick it up. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 15:59, 15 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Sounds good, keep the redirects on the page moves. If you post it up before I go sleepytimes, I'll help out. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 16:02, 15 July 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| As for the text at the top of the Guides page, it should be in a neutral "These are player written guides for other players to learn from way", rather than direct attribution to other sites and people at the top. It makes it clearer and less misleading.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 16:03, 15 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :New text nao. Let me know what you think. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 16:04, 15 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Added in a note saying that some (very few) guides are collectively edited. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 16:06, 15 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Looking good. It trims the unneeded junk about an outdated forum, while retaining the information about the best guides and how to, and how not to use them.--{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 16:07, 15 July 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Once those pages are moved I'll post on Kevan's talk and ask him to create a proper namespace out of Guides (and also to update the damn wiki software :P). {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 13:44, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Don't ask for the latter, else he might just ignore the entire post ;D --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:46, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::I'm starting to think it's time for another official policy/petition thing :P. Worked last time. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 13:55, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::To think we might be able to delete the ghosts... I... I just don't know what to think... ;_; --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 13:59, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::The ghosts would be kept and protected as historical pages ;). {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 14:09, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::Historical Events in themselves! --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:37, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::The ghosts are an endangered species. :D --{{User:Drawde/Sig}} 14:51, 16 July 2010 (BS
| |
| :::Seriously, does anyone have a problem with another petition to update the software. It's years old. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 17:21, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::Make it so. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 17:25, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::It will be done ... in the morning. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 17:27, 16 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::Nup, I didn't check either so it's good you did the logical way. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:34, 19 July 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Barricade Plan Modification. ==
| |
|
| |
| I would like to implement a system by which buildings of different resource types can also be revealed to be ruined, powered, or unpowered. I already have the technical knowledge to do this, which I gained from the addition of the "perma-ruin" designation. I would not be creating this to change the way barricade plans function on this wiki; I merely wish to use this ability for my personal ends and the ends of those affiliated with me.
| |
|
| |
| However, this is a big change (even if it's just an addition) to a major wiki component, so I came here before creating the necessary components.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:26, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :What's your proposed method? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:27, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::I'd just create the necessary templates representing each condition. If you want, you could link them to the "barricade plan" article, but I don't see that as necessary, since this is mainly for personal use.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:30, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Yes, but how do they work with the existing information? I'm assuming it's a colour change or something similar - do they convey the information needed ''instead'' of other information, or ''alongside'' everything already there? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:32, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::Keep the border colour for type identification, and use interior colour to indicate status. You are now obligated to support this idea due to my superior, English, spelling.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:36, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::Seems ok. I say give it a go. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:38, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::Splendiferous.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:40, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Preliminary test results are good, and up in my lab if you care. Of course, you've probably already stalked your way to them via recent changes...{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:47, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Right you are. I dunno, I'm not quite feeling it. Reverse it, maybe. Have the interior colour represent type, and the border represent status. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:49, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::You know, that really fits the current barricade level identification mechanic nicely. I guess I'll start changing them over.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:58, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::It's a real pain to differentiate between the normal black border and my ruin colour. I guess you can tell on all the TRPs because they normally have different borders, but generic buildings will be tough to differentiate.
| |
| :::
| |
| :::I either need a new colour, or a new system of representing this info.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:01, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::Try a bone shade, like {{C|#EAEAAE|#EAEAAE|#000000}}. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:06, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::Check it out; you can barely even tell it's there on the auto repair, and that's just because we know to look for it. Also, I can see by your code that you coloured that word, so I figured I should tell you that my browser doesn't read those. I wrote a custom script for page viewing that defaults everything to black, white, and green.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:15, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::I see what you mean. It might be tough finding a colour that work against all the different colours yet is unique enough to work. Perhaps a tinted grey, like cinerous (#98817B) or bistre (#3D2B1F); or a pale brown like écru (#C2B280) or taupe (#483C32). I may in fact know too much about colours. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:28, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::Check the history; every one of those closely resembles an existing border type. What was so bad about the first method, again?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:34, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::The first method ''seems'' like it's trying to convey something through borders. The border colour stands out so much it seems like the most important thing when it's secondary to the status. Perhaps universally muting all the building type colours would help. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:40, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::I think the building colours are important quick-identification tools. Removing them to keep boarders intact would be like removing your arm to stop an itch, in my opinion.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:32, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::But your way removes the building colours and keeps the borders. {{Huh}} {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 02:35, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::::The borders are coloured just like the buildings.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 03:04, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::::Yes. Your idea keeps the smaller indicator of type and replace the larger one, mine keeps the larger one and replaces the smaller one. That way you show "'''building type x''' <small>with y status</small>", and not "'''status type x''' <small>in building type y</small>". {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 03:09, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::::::I don't like it much more than you do, but I just haven't found a colour that's easily visible along the boarder while also being distinct from all other border colours.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 03:20, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| :I don't understand why this is being brought up ''again'', let alone being brought up as a formal request, given that we [[User_talk:The_Rooster#Roftwood_Barricade_Plan|addressed it last month]] and it shouldn't require outside input. There should not be a need to change the official barricade plan templates. Just [[User:Maverick_Farrant/Sandbox_6|do what Maverick did]] and create new templates that you can use in your barricade plans. Then, for the code that looks like <code>type01=NT</code> in the barricade plan usage, just replace <code>NT</code> with the name of your special template (e.g. Maverick made [[Template:BP-NTRuin]], which he uses by editing the code so it looks like <code>type01=NTRuin</code> (I'd suggest naming it something more unique in order to avoid future conflicts, however).
| |
|
| |
| :Now, if what you want to actually do is redo the barricade plan templates so that they can be used officially for this purpose, then I'm gonna have to disagree with the idea for reasons I cited in that [[User_talk:The_Rooster#Roftwood_Barricade_Plan|earlier discussion]]. Until we can identify a ''good'' way of handling the problem (and I do have some ideas for handling ruins on the barricade plans), I'd prefer not to do it officially. Also, there's a question of purpose, in that the barricade plans are meant to represent the ideal state of the suburb, whereas whether a building is lit or ruined is a matter of its current status, and representing both in the same graphic isn't advised since the purposes are orthogonal to each other. So, if we did want to do something like this, it may just be better (and I prefer better over easier most of the time) to make a new template with that express purpose. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 07:24, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::I don't see why you'd want it even if it did look good. Just make a map based on danger reports, so you don't have to update them and a totally separate map. That said, I think "I merely wish to use this ability for my personal ends and the ends of those affiliated with me." means he agreed with you in the first place. --{{User:TripleU/Sig}} 08:45, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::I figured he was talking about something else since he was asking for permission to make major changes to the barricade plan template for personal reasons. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 09:25, 18 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Ya, my response to this conversation was going to be along the lines of "mehmehmehmehmehmehmeh". There's no reason why you should need to change entire cade plan template for such a directed change, as aichon. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 14:49, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Did you guys check out my changes? Aichon's idea is exactly what I went ahead and did. As for danger reports: like I said, this isn't meant to be linked to those in any way.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 22:37, 17 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::Admittedly, I did not, but I saw you talking about border changes and the like and figured you were trying something else. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 09:25, 18 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::The border styles were an experimental alternative that came with a lot of color and readability issues.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 19:27, 18 July 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Achievements ==
| |
|
| |
| I'd like to make a template-based achievement system for Urban Dead, then start a movement to make them popular amongst wiki users. This will involve an assload of template making, though most of it will probably use the flagbox template and prevent an avalanche of useless space. First off will be porting in Dead Rising achievements.
| |
|
| |
| Anyone in?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:24, 3 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Maybe. Not if it's going to be super trenchy though. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:30, 3 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Naw, it'd be whatever the game's achievements are, maybe tailored a bit for UD. I.E. "kill 50,000 zombies" (bad example), survive 24 hours outdoors, change into 25 different outfits, take an iWitness of more than 50 players, Be in the same building as 8 female survivors...etc.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:52, 3 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Lol! If you keep the hilarious variety up and require proof, it could work. I won't participate though, not really my thing -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 01:59, 3 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::I could require proof, but it's easy to fake those, and some of them can't be proven.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 02:32, 3 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::So like with [[Video Camera]]s? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 08:50, 3 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::No, this would be entirely meta; no actual game features would be changed (or probably could be). It'd just be for fun.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 16:27, 3 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| I would support this, and may even help in the creation of some achievements if needed. I would recommend a page sized template which users could make a new page for in their user space, and then slots for the achievements to fit in to. It would be easy to update, and would look good. You'd need someone adept at coding though, or to give me a day to rummage through the code from GSGM's last template.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 23:34, 9 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :I have a lingering suspicion you're referring to me...and don't bother with the GSGM's code. It's a BEAR to work with, especially if you weren't there when I wrote it and weren't looking over my shoulder. Even I have trouble following all of it if I go back and look at that template now. But yes, an idea like that could be implemented with far simpler code, I should think. I'd want to see some mockups of ideas though, since I'm not particularly keen on designing ''and'' implementing, nor am I interested in the idea on its own merits. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 23:56, 9 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Well, when I'm free, I'll have a look through. It'll be good for me, and it'll help me get better at wiki-coding generally, even if I don't crack the problem at hand.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 23:58, 9 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| {{Flagbox|black|image.png|Outdoorsman|This user has survived 24 hours outdoors}}
| |
| Example^ We just import the achievement icons (or something more appropriate) and make a template for it. Users just make an "achievement" subpage or subsection and post the relevant accomplishments there.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 00:16, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :Yeah, personally, that's how I'd do it. Another way to do it, which is more in line with what Yonn suggested, would be to make some sort of a "panel" with empty slots in it, and as you complete achievements, the boxes fill in with little images, ribbons, or just miniflagboxes for those achievements. It's possible, and the code wouldn't be ''too'' hard, but, as I said, I'd want to see someone else come up with a design for it, since I'm not doing it. If someone can work out most of the design though, I might be able to be finagled into coding it up. Again though, I'd go with your idea of just using flagboxes if you're going to pursue this thing. Much easier, and people already understand them. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 00:31, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Create a template that's a table with empty cells spaced out at the right size for each achievement, with a comment tag in each hiding the achievement's code. Simple case of removing the comment tags for each one as it's completed. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 00:35, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::Sort of like [[User:Misanthropy/Sandbox19|this]]. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:01, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::If it means that "regular" people will have to look at raw code for tables, it isn't going to work well enough, no matter how simple. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:07, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::All they need to do is copy-paste blocks at a time (tables can be made all at once, and released as "achievement packs" themed around a thing, so increasing counts of something can be one "pack" which is one table. All the end user needs to do is remove the comment tags around the achievement, and it'll be clearly marked which one it is. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:08, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::I'll say again: I think it's asking too much of regular users. You're underestimating their level of incompetence. Just look at Suggestions, Developing Suggestions, or Recruitment. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:37, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::We'd have to update the tables every time we added an achievement, right? Not sure about that...{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 01:38, 10 August 2010 (BST)editconflict
| |
| :::::::I really dislike the idea of dumbing everything down just so the lowest common denominator can get it right away. It's pretty simple, and anyone having trouble with it will be able to come to one of the people involved in the project and ask, thus learning about things directly. Also, Lelouch, nope. Like I said above, you'd divide achievements into groups, with one of those tables per group. New achievements just mean creating a new table. They'd just nest one above another when added to a page, or could be given separate headers to differentiate different classes of achievement. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 01:42, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::What I've been working on, [[User:Yonnua Koponen/Achieve|Seen here]], is a page which users would template in to their user space as a new page, or could be at request, and then they would add the Achievement templates to the bottom of the list. Each template would be a title, description, and then an open date field, and would fit with the open table above. They could also have fancy colours. The template addign is idiot-proof, and I feel it would look better than the somewhat ugly standard templates which we already have, as seen above.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:04, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::Examples [[Template:AchUltimateHero|here]] and [[Template:AchMega|here]], but obviously with a nicer looking header. Thoughts?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:13, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::There's also a very poor example of a page to explain it to people located [[User talk:Yonnua Koponen/Achieve|here.]]--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 10:57, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::::Very nice system. The block colours are a bit of an eyesore, but the templates look great. I assume the images go in the leftmost box?{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 17:20, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::::No, wait, where do the images go? Are we doing without them? I guess we don't ''need'' them...{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 17:21, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::::::Images are a simple addition. If you gimme a second I could update mine to show some images. I'd go with one image for a range of achievements, rather than one for each. I guess what I'm thinking visually is a bit like the missions in [http://www.urban-rivals.com Urban Rivals], with grouped achievements sharing an image but having different names, etc. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 17:27, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::::::Images might be more trouble than they're worth. The current method I'm leaning towards would require the importing of about 100 images into the wiki; that sounds like a lot of work.{{User:Lelouch/sig}} 17:30, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::::::::Images integrated in my system. 60px default.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature2}} 18:08, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::::::::Ditto. [[User:Misanthropy/Sandbox19|Currently just mock-ups]] but that'll give you a look at what it might look like. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 18:10, 10 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Scout Safehouse: A Quandrey ==
| |
|
| |
| So, it's established that Scouting a safehouse grants a 10% chance of a free action within the building for the cost of 30AP. This is theoretically highly inefficient; under the best circumstances, it would take at least six days of doing nothing but actions inside the safehouse to justify scouting.
| |
|
| |
| Now, this is my quandary: does the 10% apply to ''all'' actions? Including AP intensive ones, like reviving?
| |
|
| |
| Essentially, is it possible to get a free revive inside a building with the Scout Safehouse skill? {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 02:58, 25 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| :Even if revives are also free at a 10% rate, you don't reduce the break even point of 300AP. But you might be able to exploit it in a similar method as [[Guides:Beyond average damage]]. If you wanted 20AP for free, you are more likely to get it with two free revives than twenty free 1AP actions. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 03:36, 25 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ::The thing I'm wondering is if this could be exploitable in (rot revive) places like [[The Devonshire Building (Rhodenbank)|The Devonshire Building]], where indoor revives are fairly common.
| |
|
| |
| ::Also, a cookie to the first person who takes a screenshot of a free revive. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 03:41, 25 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| :::Keeping are rot revive open but unruined would be a challenge in itself. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 05:30, 25 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ::::I've seen it happen in places like [[The Devonshire Building (Rhodenbank)|The Devonshire Building]] where they put up a few barricades to keep the riff-raff out. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 05:54, 25 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :::::We also have no guarantee that it would spare you 10 AP rather than just 1 AP. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 06:51, 25 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Event help ==
| |
|
| |
| This is a call to any past event planners. I've got a new event project in the works that I'd like to get off the ground soon (mid-September). Check proof of concept and some design concepts [[User:Vapor/sandbox/halloween|here]]. I'll be honest I've never launched an event before and I could use some help. Either direct help or some guidance would be greatly appreciated. I want it to be successful but the more I brainstormed the event the more difficult it seemed it would be to launch. I've asked for help from my group so I hope to have some backup but so far I've only received some feedback and not much in the way of volunteers. So what do ya say? Wanna help this n00b get an awesome event off the ground? {{User:Vapor/sig}} 21:16, 25 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| :First tip: make an awesome wiki page, which you've done. Second tip, I think from watching many events come and go, most of the negotiations and invitations are done ''off'' the wiki. Go and find out some groups and let them know of your event and that you'd like them there. Don't do this on the wiki, a lot of groups are apathetic about stuff on the wiki imo, though an awesome wiki page means it isn't going to look unappealing and shit, like the "Lets not get our asses kicked" business going on now. That's my two cents. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 01:41, 26 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::Thanks for the tip. I've been doing just that with my main alt, trying to stir up some interest in the first of the three events. So far so good I think. I've also almost completed the wiki page. I'd kind of like some more feedback. Basically just wanting to know if it will likely be a successful event(s). Some of the events I've planned might rely on high numbers of participants, so I'm going to start pimping it heavily very soon. If I've left off something or I've done something that would ensure it's failure, I'd like to know before I launch it officially so I could possibly replan. Thanks for the help. {{User:Vapor/sig}} 05:38, 31 August 2010 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Questions ==
| |
|
| |
| I'm not really sure where I should be asking the following questions so if I'm in the wrong spot, let me know. Thanks :)
| |
|
| |
| Anyway, I have two questions about Malton and its suburbs.
| |
|
| |
| 1. What is the layout of Malton like? I know it's composed of suburbs and bordered to the north by the river Kevan and mountain ranges as well as a forest to the east. I'm mainly referring to the actual layout of the suburbs. Are they compact and tightly knit together like a city block or spread out and interwoven with rivers and fields? It's kind of an odd question, but I'm curious because I've seen pictures of England and it's styled differently than New York and I don't know if the city of Malton is merely a regional name containing suburbs like London, or if it's like New York with each city block being a suburb.
| |
|
| |
| 2. Are suburb names like Stanbury Village and Foulkes Village merely a play-on-words like New York's Greenwich Village, or are they actual small-town villages like the fictional village of Sandford in the movie, Hot Fuzz?
| |
|
| |
| I'm sorry if there's any confusion. Typing logically with a headache don't go hand-in-hand together. --[[User:TheBardofAwesome|TheBardofAwesome]] 05:16, 4 September 2010 (BST)
| |
| :I like to think of it as an old and 'naturally' evolving city like London or Dublin, where it's tightly packed but uneven, as opposed to the regulated and ordered layout of new cities like New York or Sydney. While it fits on a grid, it's only for convenience sake, and is probably pretty irregular in layout. As for the second point, I'd say it's a halfway point between the two - cities often grow to consume outlying towns, and it's quite concievable that Stanbury and Foulkes were border towns that are now blended right into the sprawl of greater Malton. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 07:33, 4 September 2010 (BST)
| |
| ::I kind of agree, villages swallowed up by urban sprawl over time. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:14, 4 September 2010 (BST)
| |
button.
